DYNO CHART! Doesn't seem to add up....

[Reaper948]

Fresh Dyno Chart (http://www.mercurymarauder.net/gallery/data/500/DSC04997.JPG)

So I took my baby up to PowerHouse in Girard Pennsylvania today....1.5 hour drive. Finally got the 4.10s installed - (great btw, engine response and acceleration) But then I put her on the Dyno and Mike from Powerhouse tuned the AF ratio and what not....... 282 horsepower and 288 torque at the wheels? Doesn't seem to add up if my AF ratio was tuned as well. Not including 4.10s,shouldn't the mods I have (JLT, full kooks) have any more effect on my car?

[Petrograde]

Welcome to the Mustang Dynometer. Most people like the DynoJets (they read higher,.. better zip up my flame suit! :P )

My MM with only bolts-ons and stock exhaust came out at just over 200 rwhp and rwtq.

I love the tune based on the Mustang Dyno,.. numbers be damned,.. I can feel how much more power I have.

If you want to see a dyno chart around 300 hp you'll have to go run on a Dynojet.

[Bradley G]

What was the baseline number(s) before the induction and exhaust?

[Reaper948]

I think our baseline numbers are around 240 if im not mistaken?...

Why do I feel like my car is faster but I SHOULD be making more horsepower

[Petrograde]

I think our baseline numbers are around 240 if im not mistaken?...

Why do I feel like my car is faster but I SHOULD be making more horsepower

Are base line numbers are around 240,.... on a DynoJet Dyno.

Mustang Dynos are a different animal. IIRC there was a thread comparing the different kinds of dynos a while back.

[Bradley G]

No baseline numer(s) on your car, Eh?
Seems hard to compare before and after with no "Before".
#'s seem pretty in line to me.

[Smokie]

When you say your numbers should be higher, compared to what? Most members that have posted dyno results here do not use a Mustang Dyno, the only way to have a valid comparison is if you have a before mods dyno on the same Mustang Dyno to compare your results.

If you would like to compare numbers, you would need to run your car on a Dynojet dyno; that's what most members use here.:)

[DEFYANT]

:popcorn:

Oil, superchargers, boobies, the lasts post thread.... and dyno charts.

This thread has great potential.

I am kicked back in the recliner. Have at it boys

:flamer:

[Reaper948]

When you say your numbers should be higher, compared to what? Most members that have posted dyno results here do not use a Mustang Dyno, the only way to have a valid comparison is if you have a before mods dyno on the same Mustang Dyno to compare your results.

If you would like to compare numbers, you would need to run your car on a Dynojet dyno; that's what most members use here.:)

Okay, Sorry wasn't more specific. They should be higher in terms of the mods I've put in. Logan scored 29 horsepower and 15 torque when he installed the Kooks system. so thats 269 horsepower (after adding it to 240) so after the JLT, which should be like maybe 5 horsepower at the wheels without an AF Tune? should bring me up to 274... And then...having a dynotune, shouldn't that give me some more?........OKAY OKAY OKAY - Maybe the numbers are in line and I'm just getting greedy........... :o

[CRUZTAKER]

I have no idea how much these Mustang dynos are off.....

I'd figure with what you have done, you would be somewhere around the numbers you posted on a dynotec....perhaps a little lower.

You really needed a baseline. Stock MM is around 238-243 right?

Chip and A/F is worth 17-22 right?

A fellow buckeye with this basic setup ran 263 on a dynotec last year.

The entire KOOKS system was a big gain for me. I can't nail it down, as I failed to do a baseline as well and added other items with the exhuast.
Easily the KOOKS should gain 25-35 right?

Don't count on much with the CAI. I gained zero...zip...nada...but ran MUCH better et's at the track.

I believe you are where you should be.

The next sheapest big gain bolt on is pullies.

Then it's off to radical multi position chips and running race fuel....:P