Vortech347
04-25-2007, 07:10 AM
247rwhp 267tq!!
I was very impressed with how the car did. This was on a mustang dyno (has load and usually lower numbers) AND it was NOT corrected for altitude.
When I dyno'd the car completely stock on a Dynojet that corrects it was 235rwhp 258tq.
Difference?
I cleaned my K&N and had a Rienhart tune!! The first pull it was very rich, blower rich, 11.9! I pulled as much fuel as the X-cal would let me (6%) and ran again. Picked up another 7hp and A/F is still rich at 12.4:1 across the board.
I'm pretty damn happy!!! There was a Mach 1 with long tubes, x-pipe, catback, PHP intake spacer, 4.10's, ect. He did 257rwhp 270ft-lbs (but no tune on the car). Then a Stock Mach ran and did 250rwhp 265ft-lbs.
Can't beat that with a stick!!!!!!
I was very impressed with how the car did. This was on a mustang dyno (has load and usually lower numbers) AND it was NOT corrected for altitude.
When I dyno'd the car completely stock on a Dynojet that corrects it was 235rwhp 258tq.
Difference?
I cleaned my K&N and had a Rienhart tune!! The first pull it was very rich, blower rich, 11.9! I pulled as much fuel as the X-cal would let me (6%) and ran again. Picked up another 7hp and A/F is still rich at 12.4:1 across the board.
I'm pretty damn happy!!! There was a Mach 1 with long tubes, x-pipe, catback, PHP intake spacer, 4.10's, ect. He did 257rwhp 270ft-lbs (but no tune on the car). Then a Stock Mach ran and did 250rwhp 265ft-lbs.
Can't beat that with a stick!!!!!!