Aren Jay
07-14-2009, 06:44 PM
When one looks at this in the light of the day the questions that one naturally forms follow according to the form of distinction that if the answer were to be presented in a way that the answer would be such that it is, in a way that would allow one to divulge the reason and state the answer to the question but only after the answer is given thus allowing the question to be given such that the answer would of course mean the answer only if and unto the resultant perprosal of such a way that the answer and querstions divulgence would result in the way that the answer to the question is not the given but the resultant persueing to and on condition of the question.
From such a means that the only way that the willing talks of the questioner can have the answer it muc to the effect that if has and needs to have an answer with which it has to base the question the answer to the question must not follow but rather proceed the question or it just would not make sense in the questioners question or for the answeres answer should in not be the answer to proced and procure the question as it has to such already been done.
The formulation fo the question must be based not upon the hope or desire or inclination of the answerer to answer but to the answer that the aswerer has answered previous to the questioner's question questioning not the answer but the prediliction that the answer be based upon the answer of the answer for the question to be rightly formed.
Thus the answer must result in the pre-inclination fo the mind of the questioner in such a manner that the questioner must ask the answer so that the answerer can answer in in the form of that the the is then. uch that the the is then results in the questioner getting the question through the answer that the answerer questions.
Forms of this sort will allow for the questioner to question and the answerer to answer the answer of the question and the the of the the to be the the of the answer for the question.
Sir Humphrey Appleby.
From such a means that the only way that the willing talks of the questioner can have the answer it muc to the effect that if has and needs to have an answer with which it has to base the question the answer to the question must not follow but rather proceed the question or it just would not make sense in the questioners question or for the answeres answer should in not be the answer to proced and procure the question as it has to such already been done.
The formulation fo the question must be based not upon the hope or desire or inclination of the answerer to answer but to the answer that the aswerer has answered previous to the questioner's question questioning not the answer but the prediliction that the answer be based upon the answer of the answer for the question to be rightly formed.
Thus the answer must result in the pre-inclination fo the mind of the questioner in such a manner that the questioner must ask the answer so that the answerer can answer in in the form of that the the is then. uch that the the is then results in the questioner getting the question through the answer that the answerer questions.
Forms of this sort will allow for the questioner to question and the answerer to answer the answer of the question and the the of the the to be the the of the answer for the question.
Sir Humphrey Appleby.