PDA

View Full Version : The 2011 raping of your income, aka tax increases and things expiring all explained!



ctrlraven
09-08-2010, 09:16 AM
In just six months, on January 1, 2011, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect.

They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves.

On January 1, 2011, here's what happens... (read it to the end, so you see all three waves)...

First Wave:
Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families.

These will all expire on January 1, 2011.

Personal income tax rates will rise.

The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed).

The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent.

All the rates in between will also rise.

Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates.

The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:
The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
The 25% bracket rises to 28%
The 28% bracket rises to 31%
The 33% bracket rises to 36%
The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

Higher taxes on marriage and family.

The "marriage penalty" (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income.

The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child.

The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level.

The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.

The return of the Death Tax.
This year only, there is no death tax. (It's a quirk!) For those dying on or after January 1, 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes, a business, a retirement account, could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones. Think of the farmers who don't make much money, but their land, which they purchased years ago with after-tax dollars, is now worth a lot of money. Their children will have to sell the farm, which may be their livelihood, just to pay the estate tax if they don't have the cash sitting around to pay the tax. Think about your own family's assets. Maybe your family owns real estate, or a business that doesn't make much money, but the building and equipment are worth $1 million. Upon their death, you can inherit the $1 million business tax free, but if they own a home, stock, cash worth $500K on top of the $1 million business, then you will owe the government $275,000 cash! That's 55% of the value of the assets over $1 million! Do you have that kind of cash sitting around waiting to pay the estate tax?

Higher tax rates on savers and investors.

The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011.

The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011.

These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.

Second Wave:
Obamacare

There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

The "Medicine Cabinet Tax"
Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).


The "Special Needs Kids Tax"
This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit). There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children.

There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States , and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education.

Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington , D.C. ( National Child Research Center ) can easily exceed $14,000 per year.

Under tax rules, FSA dollars can not be used to pay for this type of special needs education.

The HSA (Health Savings Account) Withdrawal Tax Hike.
This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAsand other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

Third Wave:
The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and Employer Tax Hikes

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they'll be in for a nasty surprise-the AMT won't be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired.

The major items include:
The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year.

According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center , Congress' failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families-rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear.

Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or "depreciate") equipment purchases up to $250,000.

This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can currently expense half of their purchases of equipment.

In January of 2011, all of it will have to be "depreciated."

Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses.

There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the "research and experimentation tax credit," but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.

Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced.

The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available.

Tax credits for education will be limited.

Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses.

Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut.

Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed.

The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.

Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed.

Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA.

This contribution also counts toward an annual "required minimum distribution." This ability will no longer be there.

PDF Version Read more: <http://www.atr.org/six-months-untilbr-largest-tax-hikes-a5171#>; http://www.atr.org/six-months-untilb...#ixzz0sY8waPq1 (http://www.atr.org/six-months-untilbr-largest-tax-hikes-a5171##ixzz0sY8waPq1)

And worse yet?

Now, your insurance will be INCOME on your W2's!

One of the surprises we'll find come next year, is what follows - - a little "surprise" that 99% of us had no idea was included in the "new and improved" healthcare legislation . . . those who backed this administration will be astonished!

Starting in 2011, (next year folks), your W-2 tax form sent by your employer will be increased to show the value of whatever health insurance you are given by the company. It does not matter if that's a private concern or governmental body of some sort.

If you're retired? So what... your gross will go up by the amount of insurance you get.

You will be required to pay taxes on a large sum of money that you have never seen. Take your tax form you just finished and see what $15,000 or $20,000 additional gross does to your tax debt. That's what you'll pay next year.

For many, it also puts you into a new higher bracket so it's even worse.

This is how the government is going to buy insurance for the 15% that don't have insurance and it's only part of the tax increases.

Not believing this??? Here is a research of the summaries.....

On page 25 of 29: TITLE IX REVENUE PROVISIONS- SUBTITLE A: REVENUE OFFSET PROVISIONS-(sec. 9001, as modified by sec. 10901) Sec.9002 "requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employees gross income."

MrBluGruv
09-08-2010, 09:29 AM
Few things make me more furious than the death tax. Pure greed and inhumanity.


That is all.

sailsmen
09-08-2010, 09:50 AM
Per the US Treasury there have been 3 major tax cuts since WWII.
Kennedy 1964 tax revenues $113B 1972 $207B
Reagan 1981 tax revenues $599B 1989 $991B
Bush 2000 tax revenues $2025B 2008 $2524.

Look at your income and your additional tax. Congress has not even brought up extending, it expires 1-1-11.

Individual Income Taxes Under Presidents Clinton and Bush, 1999 Law and 2008 Law
For taxpayers who take the standard deduction and have no children
Taxpayer Tax under Clinton, 1999 tax law Tax under Bush, 2008 tax law Savings under Bush % Under Clinton % Under Bush % Reduction
Single, income of 30,000 $3,157.50 $2,756.25 $401.25 11% 9% -13%
Single, income of 50,000 $7,262.50 $6,606.25 $656.25 15% 13% -9%
Married, income of $50,000 $5,085.00 $4,012.50 $1,072.50 10% 8% -21%
Single, income of $75,000 $14,262.50 $12,856.25 $1,406.25 19% 17% -10%
Married, income of $75,000 $9,426.50 $7,762.50 $1,664.00 13% 10% -18%
Single, income of $125,000* $29,378.50 $26,472.25 $2,906.25 24% 21% -10%
Married, income of $125,000* $23,426.50 $19,462.50 $3,964.00 19% 16% -17%
*This chart does not take into account the Alternative Minimum Tax
The bottom 47% does not pay income tax. The bottom 40% gets money from the Federal Gov't in the form of "earned income tax credit", welfare, etc.
The % of the income tax paid by the top 1%, who have 20% of the income, has increased from 36% to 40%.
Any business model that pays 40% of it's customers to shop and collects 40% of it's revenue from 1% of it's customers will fail.
The BIG QUESTION is where will the money to pay the increased income tax come from. Will it come from no summer camp, no dining out, not buying a house or a car, not hiring another employee? The BIGGER QUESTION is what will Gov't do with this increased tax?
For those who claim continuing to pay the taxes you pay is a tax cut? How can paying what you are paying now a tax cut? How can going back to the increased taxes of Clinton not a tax increaset? Al Gore cast the tie breaking vote in the Senate to pass the Clinton TAX INCREASE!
A married couple making $125,000 per year income tax is going up by $3,964!

88LTDCV351
09-08-2010, 10:40 AM
I know high taxes are bad and I don't like them either. But I kind of have this small part of me that remembers that if we paid less taxes or our taxes keep getting cut with the current and past spend of Reps and Dems presidents, wouldn't we be the United States of China (since they buy most of our debt?). So I'd probably be ok if my taxes were raised a bit so we could stay the good old U.S. of A and as long as I could still get by comofortably enough.

88LTDCV351
09-08-2010, 10:48 AM
I guess the government could cut spending and waste and entitlements so taxes could go down. But I know everyone doesn't want it cut in their backyard also so your darned if you do and darned if you don't I guess. I don't know what the answer to entitlements are, but I sure would hate to tell my dad who worked hard all his life that the Social Security safety net he earned would go away. I don't know where the line should be drawn as far as what the government should provide its citizens as a safety net for its unfortunate (and the loafers) versus cost to the rest of the tax payers. THen I guess that is the debate and I don't think anyone has the answer. If they did, that person might be president.

Anyway, just some thoughts.

Zack
09-08-2010, 11:20 AM
Its all over 12-21-2012 anyway

sailsmen
09-08-2010, 11:22 AM
In 2 years Fed spending has increased 25%. The July 27, 2010 CBO report statyes that current Fed spending is unsustainable resulting in a 55% increase in Public Debt to GDP from 40% to 63%. The 2 year increase in Public Debt enough to pay off the mortgage on every third house.
The CBO said Fed spending needs to be cut 20%, back to 2008 levels.
You could double the income tax to 75% on the top 1% and it still would not eliminate the Deficit.

What is even more disturbing is the 10 year Budget raising Public Debt to GDP to 90%, which is an increase in Public Debt by an amount to pay off everysingle home mortgage plus give everyone a $7,000 Bonus. The IMF says it will not be 90% but 105% where Greece was 2 years ago.

My latest SS statement says I will only collect 76% of Benefits. Gov't STOLE the SS Funds! They should be put in jail, stripped of their "generous" Fed Pensions.

All that is needed to maintain solvency and save SS is to;
1) Roll back Fed spending to 2008
2) Freeze Fed Civilian hiring and pay
3) Roll all Fed Civilian into SS
5) Replace the SS COLA for CPI
6) Index the SS retirtement age.

Our GOV't is so corrupt with power the above 6 will not even be considered. Any increase in taxes will result in increased spending.

sailsmen
09-08-2010, 11:26 AM
Its all over 12-21-2012 anyway

The people who wrote the calender did not have an "end of World theme" as part of their culture/religion.

Maybe their fingers got tired or they stopped to see the human sacrifice.;)

Either way we will find out shortly.

tbone
09-08-2010, 12:48 PM
And Obambi will look into the camera and say, "I did not raise taxes". He is letting Bushes' tax cuts expire and imposed Obambi Health Care on us with all of its onerous regulations. That's the same as a tax increase. He lies.

He insisted, many times, while pushing the Health Care bill on us, that forcing us to buy insurance was not a tax. (See the Stephanopolos interview). Then, when he found out that he could not make people buy insurance because it went against the Commerce Cause, (see that pesky little thing called the United States Constitution he swore to uphold) OOOOOOHHHHHH, NOW IT IS A TAX!!!!! But he promised "not to raise taxes one thin dime on people making less than $250,000. No wait, $200,000. No I meant $150,000. Oh, nevermind. Hey, check out this new dog I have!"

boatmangc
09-08-2010, 02:52 PM
Its all over 12-21-2012 anyway



Please God!!

guspech750
09-08-2010, 06:59 PM
Im not sorry. I hope all of Washington burns and kills all of our governmental idiots.

I can only hope and pray for 12/21/2012

Bradley G
09-08-2010, 07:15 PM
Ask yourself why some are pushing to extent the misery?

sailsmen
09-08-2010, 07:28 PM
Im not sorry. I hope all of Washington burns and kills all of our governmental idiots.

I can only hope and pray for 12/21/2012

Funniest comment I have ever heard about 2012.

FordNut
09-08-2010, 07:38 PM
Expiring tax cuts:
Obama wants to extend the tax cuts for the lower incomes only and let the cuts expire for high income filers which includes most small businesses. Saw on the news tonight that letting the tax cuts expire will only affect about 2.5% of small businesses. Doesn't sound like much, but looking at the absolute numbers it's about 900,000 small businesses. One of the business owners interviewed said it would raise his taxes by $100k/yr and he would have to cut 2-4 jobs. So maybe 2-3 Million more jobs could be lost. Recovery.

I think we're all Americans, and we're all in this together. Either let the tax cuts expire for everybody or extend them for everybody.

DeadVic
09-08-2010, 08:01 PM
The health insurance spend showing on W-2s is true but it is not a taxable amount. I'm not sure what the reason is to report this other than for gov't bean counters to get a handle on cost increases yr over yr. seems to me they could figure that out many other ways. so it's not going to be a tax and isn't law today. i wouldn't put it past the greedy bastards to try to tax it at some point tho.

as for the tax cuts, yes, we either keep it for everyone or let it expire for everyone. enough of this ******** about the "rich" who make $250k or more. $250 in the top 50 metro areas in this country is not as much as $100k a year in many other areas of this country.

This administration is anti business and anti capitalism. If you work hard and want more out of your life than the avg person you're somehow evil to these people. I applaud people who are happy in their little home with their pos car living pay check to pay check. glad you're happy but I prefer living to work hard and play hard and would like to not be penalized to live in such a life style. Keep your hands off my hard earned money.

tbone
09-08-2010, 08:16 PM
People that have some money are the ones that create jobs. Take more of their income and they either 1. Layoff people or 2. Don't hire people or 3. Wait until a favorable economic climate is encountered. When was the last time you got a meaningful job from your neighbor who makes $50,000 per year?

Reagan created millions of jobs, cut taxes and raised revenue to the federal government AT THE SAME TIME! AND beat the Soviet Union in the cold war! (Yes, the deficit went up, but not anything remotely like today). When will we learn from history? Mega spending, mega entitlements and increased taxes has never, and will ever work. Research it. You will see the truth.

DeadVic
09-08-2010, 08:32 PM
Then there is this nugget coming out today....

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/72404

Obama has spent MORE than every US President from Washington through Reagan COMBINED since taking office 19 months ago.

tbone
09-08-2010, 08:47 PM
Obama was and is a student of Cloward and Piven.

The two argued that many Americans who were eligible for welfare were not receiving benefits, and that a welfare enrollment drive would create a political crisis that would force U.S. politicians, particularly the Democratic Party, to enact legislation "establishing a guaranteed national income."

Anotherwords, Socialism. A fact that Obama vehemently denies. Do a fact check. Obama lies.

sailsmen
09-09-2010, 05:43 AM
TRANSCRIPT:
MODERATOR: Good morning and welcome to Odyssey on WBEZ Chicago 91.5 FM and we’re joined by Barack Obama who is Illinois State Senator from the 13th district and senior lecturer in the law school at the University of Chicago.

OBAMA: If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.
But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that.

MODERATOR: Let’s talk with Karen. Good morning, Karen, you’re on Chicago Public Radio.

KAREN: Hi. The gentleman made the point that the Warren court wasn’t terribly radical with economic changes. My question is, is it too late for that kind of reparative work economically and is that that the appropriate place for reparative economic work to take place – the court – or would it be legislation at this point?

OBAMA: Maybe I’m showing my bias here as a legislator as well as a law professor, but I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. The institution just isn’t structured that way.
You just look at very rare examples during the desegregation era the court was willing to for example order changes that cost money to a local school district. The court was very uncomfortable with it. It was very hard to manage, it was hard to figure out. You start getting into all sorts of separation of powers issues in terms of the court monitoring or engaging in a process that essentially is administrative and takes a lot of time.
The court’s just not very good at it and politically it’s very hard to legitimize opinions from the court in that regard. So I think that although you can craft theoretical justifications for it legally. Any three of us sitting here could come up with a rational for bringing about economic change through the courts."

I am a firm believer in our Political System that when the Left is elected to power they can spend on what is important to them and the same when the Right is elected to power. Neither the Left nor the Right nor anyonelse has the right to BANKRUPT our Nation. Both of Pres Obama's 10 year Budgets will clearly BANKRUPT us per the CBO, OMB and IMF. At the current spending rate we will have a Great Depression followed by World War with in 5 years.

The OMB, CBO and IMF reports are easy to read. Read them and come to your own conclusion.

Crown Vicman
09-09-2010, 06:00 AM
This is just some of the same stuff i've been trying to tell you guys myself. Our government is corrupt. Quickly go to youtube and watch "the new world order is here". Although I don't think it will fully go into effect until 2012.