ByronRACE
12-04-2013, 11:19 AM
Hey Guys,
I'm experiencing some odd behavior from my '03 M and would like to see if anyone has experienced it.
It has about 150K on it now; and has been reliable.
Recently it has been getting cold enough to use the heater again here in CA, and I've been noticing that it takes a very long time for the heater to produce any heat at all. The temperature gauge on the engine goes to the normal midpoint reading within 5-10 minutes, but it has taken as long as 20 minutes for the heat to arrive at the vents; before that it's blowing cold air. Additionally, the transition from cold to hot is not gradual like fluid warming up; it's instantaneous like someone throwing a switch.
I thought it was the heater control; which I rebuilt per the instructions on this site about a year ago with new o-rings and it has been working very well. The vacuum actuators that control the air flow seem to be working fine; it switches defrost/vent/floor fine, and the Normal/Max settings on the AC side of things seem to work as well.
This morning, after 20 minutes at idle, it was still blowing cold air with the heater cranked to maximum, so I cycled all the settings on the heater and there was no change. So, curious as to whether or not there was any hot water at the heater core, I popped the hood and felt the hoses. One side was barely body temperature, and the other side was stone cold. So, apparently there's no hot water flowing through the heater core. I'm not sure how that's possible. The top radiator hose was hot, and the temp gauge read mid-range as normal.
Before I start digging, has anyone seen this before? Is there a valve that controls coolant flow through the core? I don't have the EVTM for this vehicle and have not found an exploded diagram of the heater system yet.
Lastly, I see witness marks and a little coolant around my overflow bottle cap and a little spray and witness marks on the hood liner. It looks like it spewed water out of the overflow at some point; not sure if it's related, but it probably is.
...ideas?
Thanks,
Byron
I'm experiencing some odd behavior from my '03 M and would like to see if anyone has experienced it.
It has about 150K on it now; and has been reliable.
Recently it has been getting cold enough to use the heater again here in CA, and I've been noticing that it takes a very long time for the heater to produce any heat at all. The temperature gauge on the engine goes to the normal midpoint reading within 5-10 minutes, but it has taken as long as 20 minutes for the heat to arrive at the vents; before that it's blowing cold air. Additionally, the transition from cold to hot is not gradual like fluid warming up; it's instantaneous like someone throwing a switch.
I thought it was the heater control; which I rebuilt per the instructions on this site about a year ago with new o-rings and it has been working very well. The vacuum actuators that control the air flow seem to be working fine; it switches defrost/vent/floor fine, and the Normal/Max settings on the AC side of things seem to work as well.
This morning, after 20 minutes at idle, it was still blowing cold air with the heater cranked to maximum, so I cycled all the settings on the heater and there was no change. So, curious as to whether or not there was any hot water at the heater core, I popped the hood and felt the hoses. One side was barely body temperature, and the other side was stone cold. So, apparently there's no hot water flowing through the heater core. I'm not sure how that's possible. The top radiator hose was hot, and the temp gauge read mid-range as normal.
Before I start digging, has anyone seen this before? Is there a valve that controls coolant flow through the core? I don't have the EVTM for this vehicle and have not found an exploded diagram of the heater system yet.
Lastly, I see witness marks and a little coolant around my overflow bottle cap and a little spray and witness marks on the hood liner. It looks like it spewed water out of the overflow at some point; not sure if it's related, but it probably is.
...ideas?
Thanks,
Byron